Briefing

T&E’s position on a Multilateral Investment Court

April 25, 2018

The pressure of civil society forced the European Commission to rethink its approach on investor-state-dispute-settlement (ISDS), resulting in the reformed investment court system (ICS), and the current multilateral investment court (MIC). The purported added value of the MIC is to render investment protection more transparent and accountable, and put an end to the controversial ISDS. This briefing outlines T&E's position on MIC.

The pressure of civil society forced the European Commission to rethink its approach on investor-statedispute-settlement (ISDS), resulting in the reformed investment court system (ICS), and the current multilateral investment court (MIC). The purported added value of the MIC is to render investment protection more transparent and accountable, and put an end to the controversial ISDS.

Related Articles

View All
Press Release

€39bn a year in public investment would ensure green transport is made in Europe - study

T&E's study shows Europe needs to shift its public investments from fossil fuel subsidies and road building to green fuels

Report

What investments are needed to green Europe's transport sector?

Europe needs to shift its public investments from fossil fuel subsidies and road building to green fuels

Gap to produce sufficient numbers of EVs to comply with the law in 2020
Briefing

Smart Implementation of the European Green Deal