The European Commission has committed to phase out fossil fuel subsidies - now it needs to act.
Company cars are seen as perks provided to employees as a part of their salary. While they are partially intended for work travel, they are also used privately -such as for commuting- to the benefit of the driver. T&E commissioned a study to ERM quantifying the subsidies that company car drivers receive for this private use. This is the first study of its kind that calculates these subsidies for every car model registered in Europe’s six biggest car markets, rather than relying on archetypal averages or example models. The research has been reviewed by leading academics in each country.
Very high fossil fuel subsidies are found in Italy, Germany, France and Poland. This is mainly due to significant benefit-in-kind (BiK) tax breaks for petrol and diesel company car drivers. This tax break overwhelmingly benefits the most affluent consumers, with company car drivers earning nearly double as much as the average European consumer.
The UK and Spain have a fairer tax system, with higher BiK rates counterbalancing tax breaks from depreciation write offs and VAT deduction for petrol and diesel vehicles. The UK specifically has a high BiK for polluting cars and a low rate for battery electric vehicles, which translates into a low fossil fuel subsidy and high corporate BEV uptake, reaching 21.5% in H1 2024. Spain has a relatively high BiK rate, but fails to incentivise companies to opt for electric cars, translating into a low corporate BEV uptake (at 3.7%).
Looking at the most sold petrol car per segment, company car drivers receive - compared to a private buyer - an average annual tax benefit of €6,800. This can go up to €21,600 for high polluting vehicles of segment E. The more CO2 the car emits, the higher fossil fuel subsidy it receives.
SUVs typically have much higher CO2 emissions than the average car and therefore a bigger climate impact. A driver of a petrol SUV company car driver receives up to €8,900 in tax benefits per year - much higher than the €5,500 for an average segment C car. The total benefit that all SUV company car drivers (petrol, diesel and plug-in hybrids) receive in the five EU countries, cost taxpayers €15 billion annually - 36% of the total €42 billion. This also explains why companies are registering twice as many climate harming SUVs than private households.
If the tax benefits for owning an electric company car are higher than for a petrol, it incentivises companies and employees to switch to an EV. Instead of handing out subsidies to fossil fuel company cars, tax incentives should be prioritised for electric vehicles. However, in Italy, Spain and Poland, electric cars receive less benefits than fossil fuel cars. While in Germany and France, the benefits for an electric company car are only marginally higher. The UK is the only country where the difference in tax benefit is high enough to incentivise companies to opt for an EV.
In a recent report, the European Commission lists taxation benefits for fossil fuel company cars as an example of an environmental harmful subsidy. The latter is defined as “any government action that confers an advantage on consumers or producers, in order to supplement their income or lower their costs and causes negative environmental impacts to increase as a result”.
Last year, the EU heads of state and government pledged in their Council conclusions to “phase out fossil fuel subsidies as soon as possible”. Candidate Climate Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra as well as President von der Leyen have also advocated to eliminate fossil fuel subsidies.
Today, 60% of new cars in the EU are registered by companies, of which more than half are given as a salary perk. In 2024 only 12.4% of all new corporate cars are fully electric, meaning that the large majority are still polluting vehicles. For the third year running, the corporate car market has been electrifying slower than the private segment.
Tax benefits for company car drivers are one of the biggest fossil fuel subsidies out there. EU’s top governments have fiscal systems where the polluter pays principle does not apply and contradict the goals of the EU Green Deal. The European Commission needs to intervene.
Phasing out these subsidies, which benefit the most affluent consumers, is a big opportunity for the new Commission to set out a climate policy that is fair while at the same time boost the EU’s green industrial agenda. Accelerating corporate car electrification will create a lead market for clean technology and boost demand for EVs while at the same time bring investment certainty for key industrial sectors such as carmakers, battery manufacturers and the power sector.
In a previous study, T&E investigated the impact of electrifying new corporate registrations in large fleets and leasing companies by 2030 would increase total demand for electric cars by 6.5 million this decade. As a consequence, 8 million more EVs would enter the used car market by 2035.
The Commission has recently closed its public consultation on Greening Corporate Fleets. Now it is time for the new Commission to deliver. In her mission letter to the candidate Commissioner for BSustainable Transport, President von der Leyen has instructed Apostolos Tzitzikostas to come forward with a proposal to make corporate fleets greener. Phasing out fossil fuel subsidies is also mentioned in her mission letter to candidate Climate Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra.
As a next step, the new Commissioners for Sustainable Transport and Climate Action should commit to come forward with a Greening Corporate Fleets Regulation that sets binding 2030 electrification targets for large corporate fleets. This Regulation can be proposed as a replacement of the Clean Vehicles Directive of which the targets have become obsolete as they are below the ambition levels of the vehicle CO2 emissions standards.
Lessons from EU funding in Central and Eastern European countries
Global competitors are bold in pursuing their industrial futures, and so should the EU.
A T&E note outlines why allowing fuels – synthetic or bio – in cars makes no environmental, economic, or industrial sense.