Briefing

Shining a light on decision-making

June 1, 2017

In recent years, there have been numerous examples of member states hiding behind Brussels’ procedures such as the opaque comitology procedure. Member states managed to significantly weaken implementing legislation, such as air pollution limits, or refusing to take a decision at all. It was up to the Commission to take a final, often unpopular decision - for which the Commission was then blamed - which led to the infamous Brussels Blame Game. As a response, Commission president Juncker proposed a targeted reform of the Comitology Regulation 182/2011.

 

While T&E welcomes any attempt to make member states more accountable and procedures more transparent, we believe the reform is not going far enough.

Concretely we demand that:

  • the transparency requirements must be significantly scaled up;
  • the reform must apply to comitology in its entirety;
  • trade-offs at ministerial level must be avoided;
  • and the European Parliament be put on equal footing if new responsibilities are created for the Council.

Related Articles

View All
Publication

Interactive dashboard: which countries have the greenest tax systems?

T&E Good Tax Guide

Yearly publication analysing and comparing the car taxation systems across 31 countries in Europe.

Press Release

Germany pushes companies towards polluting SUVs instead of electric - new study finds

The tax incentives in Germany to steer companies towards electric cars are amongst the weakest in Europe and three times lower than in France. Poland,...

Briefing

The T&E Good Tax Guide for cars

Are European countries steering drivers to go electric or stick to polluting SUVs?

The T&E Good Tax Guide is a yearly publication (3rd edition) that analyses and compares the car taxation systems across 31 countries in Europe.