Briefing

Shining a light on decision-making

June 1, 2017

In recent years, there have been numerous examples of member states hiding behind Brussels’ procedures such as the opaque comitology procedure. Member states managed to significantly weaken implementing legislation, such as air pollution limits, or refusing to take a decision at all. It was up to the Commission to take a final, often unpopular decision - for which the Commission was then blamed - which led to the infamous Brussels Blame Game. As a response, Commission president Juncker proposed a targeted reform of the Comitology Regulation 182/2011.

 

While T&E welcomes any attempt to make member states more accountable and procedures more transparent, we believe the reform is not going far enough.

Concretely we demand that:

  • the transparency requirements must be significantly scaled up;
  • the reform must apply to comitology in its entirety;
  • trade-offs at ministerial level must be avoided;
  • and the European Parliament be put on equal footing if new responsibilities are created for the Council.

Related Articles

View All
Press Release

10 years after Dieselgate, another scandal comes

10 years after Dieselgate, the car industry is paving the way for another emissions scandal

Manufacturers want to kill off EU rules that would better reflect pollution from plug-in hybrid vehicles

Opinion

Nearly all truck makers on track to meet 2025 CO2 target — ICCT finds

Five out of seven European truckmakers will easily reach the -15% CO2 target in 2025 relative to 2019, the ICCT finds in a new analysis looking at off...

Press Release

Plug-in hybrids now emit five times, on average, what official tests claim – EU data

But the car lobby is demanding that the EU scrap rules that would better reflect PHEV pollution.