Briefing

Shining a light on decision-making

June 1, 2017

In recent years, there have been numerous examples of member states hiding behind Brussels’ procedures such as the opaque comitology procedure. Member states managed to significantly weaken implementing legislation, such as air pollution limits, or refusing to take a decision at all. It was up to the Commission to take a final, often unpopular decision - for which the Commission was then blamed - which led to the infamous Brussels Blame Game. As a response, Commission president Juncker proposed a targeted reform of the Comitology Regulation 182/2011.

 

While T&E welcomes any attempt to make member states more accountable and procedures more transparent, we believe the reform is not going far enough.

Concretely we demand that:

  • the transparency requirements must be significantly scaled up;
  • the reform must apply to comitology in its entirety;
  • trade-offs at ministerial level must be avoided;
  • and the European Parliament be put on equal footing if new responsibilities are created for the Council.

Related Articles

View All
Report

T&E's annual overview of key transport trends, challenges and achievements

State of Transport 2025

European transport is still heavily reliant on fossil fuels, but electric vehicles are on the charge as the EU’s green policies start to bite. Powerin...

Press Release

Europe set to save 20 million tonnes of CO2 this year thanks to switch to EVs

State of European Transport report shows that transport emissions are starting to fall as the EV market grows, but carbon savings are being undermined...

Opinion

CTIPs? How the new acronym can turn Europe’s minerals diplomacy around

The EU needs to be more strategic in its choice of partners, while balancing its own strengths with the partner countries’ needs.