The best available scientific evidence shows that the carbon costs of many bioenergy options are high.
Two principle gaps exist in the current accounting scheme for GHG emissions from bioenergy and biofuels, one temporal and one spatial in nature:
While both studies presented in this briefing concentrate on carbon, it must be noted that other environmental impacts, such as loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services, are also significant and must be considered in policy decisions on bioenergy and biofuels.
24 non-profit organizations, including T&E, WWF, Oxfam, and Birdlife, call on the European Commission to choose climate, nature, and people over free ...
More stringent rules for ‘blue hydrogen’ based on fossil gas in the low-carbon fuels delegated act are needed to ensure a level playing field for Rene...